Field and Laboratory Evaluation of the CS655 Soil Water Content Sensor

Abstract

This measured attenuation is quadratically related to bulk electrical conductivity (EC). Along with an onboard thermistor, the CS655 allows a more robust correction of propagation time and Ka, which its predecessors, the CS615 and CS616, lacked. However, with new sensors it is necessary to quantify their practical accuracy in the field. Here, we present an overview of the CS655 sensor and an evaluation under both laboratory and field conditions, using five surface soils (0–10‐cm depth) in the laboratory and gravimetric samples collected in the field. Overall, a site‐specific calibration using a two‐term linearization of the SWC–Ka function reduced the root mean square error (RMSE) of the factory‐derived SWC of 0.073 and 0.043 m3 m−3 during batch and infiltration experiments, respectively, to 0.025 and 0.028 m3 m−3. Results further indicate that a soil‐specific calibration additionally reduced the RMSE to <0.02 m3 m−3. Field evaluation across the Texas Soil Observation Network found that calibration reduced the variance across the network but did not affect the arithmetic mean or the RMSE against gravimetric sampling, which remained ∼0.05 m3 m−3 regardless of the SWC–Ka–EC function applied. At the regional scale, a global calibration is sufficient.